1. Other pages in this release
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has explored outcomes for disabled people across a number of areas of life, through a series of bulletins. Other pages in this release include:
Aims of this work
This work aims to present comparable information that uses the Government Statistical Service’s (GSS’s) harmonised definition of disability alongside intersections with other protected characteristics.
Definition of disability
For the purposes of this analysis, a person is considered to have a disability if they have a self-reported long-standing illness, disability or impairment that causes difficulty with day-to-day activities. This definition is consistent with the Equality Act 2010 and the GSS’s harmonised definition. For further information, see the Glossary.
Definition of social participation
For the purposes of this bulletin, social participation has been measured using the following three domains:
civic engagement and social action
volunteering
participation in groups, clubs and organisations
These measures provide evidence of social cohesion, community engagement and social action.
In this bulletin, we use the Community Life Survey (England only) to look at social participation in each of these domains in the 12 months prior to completing the survey.
Article scope
Across the other outcome measures explored in this series, disabled people generally have poorer outcomes than non-disabled people. Social participation is an area of life where outcomes for disabled people were found to be comparable and in some cases higher, compared with non-disabled people. This bulletin uses the Community Life Survey (CLS) to explore the social participation of disabled adults aged 16 years and over, covering the period 2014 to 2018 for England.
Back to table of contents2. Main points
In the year ending March 2018, disabled people were more likely to have been involved in civic participation (45.5%) than non-disabled people (38.4%).
The proportions of disabled and non-disabled people who were involved in civic activism, civic consultations and social action were similar.
Disabled people were as likely to have been involved in a group, club or organisation (67.9%) as non-disabled people (71.9%) in the year ending March 2018.
There are differences in participation in certain group types; the largest difference was in “sports or exercise” groups where, in the year ending March 2018, 27.6% of disabled people had participated in a group, compared with 43.1% of non-disabled people.
For both types of volunteering (formal and informal), the proportions of disabled and non-disabled people who had participated were similar.
4. Volunteering
Volunteering includes formal volunteering (providing unpaid help through groups, clubs or organisations) and informal volunteering (providing unpaid help as an individual to people who are not a relative).
Disabled people are just as likely to have taken part in volunteering than non-disabled people
The proportions of disabled and non-disabled people who participated in volunteering were similar – this was true for both formal and informal volunteering. In the year ending March 2018, 37.7% of disabled people had taken part in formal volunteering in the previous 12 months compared with 41.9% of non-disabled people. For informal volunteering, 56.9% of disabled people participated compared with 53.5% of non-disabled people.
Figure 2: Disabled people “limited a lot” by their condition are less likely to have participated in formal volunteering than non-disabled people
Proportion of people who participated in volunteering by condition severity, England, 2017 to 2018
Source: Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport – Community Life Survey
Download this chart Figure 2: Disabled people “limited a lot” by their condition are less likely to have participated in formal volunteering than non-disabled people
Image .csv .xlsFor formal volunteering, the proportion of disabled people whose ability to carry out day-to-day activities is “limited a little” by their condition was the same as that of non-disabled people at 41.9%. However, the proportion of disabled people whose ability to carry out day-to-day activities is “limited a lot” by their condition who participated in formal volunteering (28.5%) is lower than that of both those “limited a little” and non-disabled people.
Informal volunteering shows a different picture to formal volunteering. For informal volunteering, the proportion of disabled people whose ability to carry out day-to-day activities is “limited a little” by their condition (60.1%) was higher than that of both those “limited a lot” (49.7%) and non-disabled people (53.5%). Despite their limited ability, the proportion of disabled people whose day-to-day activities are “limited a lot” by their condition that participated in informal volunteering is comparable with that of non-disabled people.
Disability is a barrier to volunteering for many disabled people, especially those that are “limited a lot”
While the proportion of disabled and non-disabled people who did not participate in formal volunteering was similar, over a third (37.1%) of all disabled people who were not involved selected “I have an illness or disability that prevents me” as a reason why they had not participated. For disabled people whose ability to carry out day-to-day activities is “limited a lot” by their condition, this figure was 68.0%.
Figure 3: Disabled people in the 50 to 64 years and 65 to 74 years age groups are less likely to have participated in formal volunteering than non-disabled people
Percentage of people who participated in formal volunteering by disability and age group, England, 2017 to 2018
Source: Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport – Community Life Survey
Download this chart Figure 3: Disabled people in the 50 to 64 years and 65 to 74 years age groups are less likely to have participated in formal volunteering than non-disabled people
Image .csv .xlsIn the 50 to 64 years and 65 to 74 years age groups, the proportion of disabled people who took part in formal volunteering was significantly less than that of non-disabled people. In all other age groups, the proportions of people who took part in formal volunteering were not significantly different for disabled and non-disabled people.
Differences, between disabled and non-disabled people, in the proportion of people who participated in informal volunteering were not significant in any age group.
See the Disability and social participation dataset for further information on the analysis of formal and informal volunteering by disability and age and additional information on formal and informal volunteering by disability and sex.
Back to table of contents5. Participation in groups, clubs and organisations
Disabled people are just as likely to have been involved in a group, club or organisation as non-disabled people
The proportion of disabled people who were involved in at least one group, club or organisation (67.9%) is similar to that of non-disabled people (71.9%).
However, when focusing on involvement in different categories of groups, clubs and organisations, there are differences between disabled and non-disabled people in the proportions of people who participated in groups in a number of categories.
Figure 4: Participation in groups, clubs and organisations varies between disabled and non-disabled people for certain group categories
Percentage of people who participated in group categories where there are differences between disabled and non-disabled people, England, 2017 to 2018
Source: Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport – Community Life Survey
Notes:
- Involvement in sports or exercise groups includes taking part, coaching or going to watch.
Download this chart Figure 4: Participation in groups, clubs and organisations varies between disabled and non-disabled people for certain group categories
Image .csv .xlsThe proportions of adults who were involved in groups for “Youth or children’s activities”, “Children’s education or schools” and “Sport or exercise” were lower for disabled adults than for non-disabled adults. The largest disparity was in “Sport or exercise” groups where the proportion of disabled people who participated was 15.5 percentage points less than that of non-disabled people. Despite this large disparity, the “Sport or exercise” category was the category with the highest participation for both disabled and non-disabled people.
Compared with non-disabled people, a higher proportion of disabled people were involved in a group, club or organisation in the “Health, disability and social welfare” or “Older people” categories.
There are a further 10 group participation categories, where disabled people were just as likely to have participated as non-disabled people. These 10 categories include “Religion”, “Local community” and “The environment or animals” (a full list of categories can be found in the Glossary).
See the Disability and social participation dataset for further information on the analysis of group participation by disability.
Figure 5: Disabled people who are “limited a lot” by their condition are less likely to have participated in a group, club or organisation than non-disabled people
Percentage of people who participated in a group, club or organisation by condition severity, England, 2017 to 2018
Source: Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport - Community Life Survey
Download this chart Figure 5: Disabled people who are “limited a lot” by their condition are less likely to have participated in a group, club or organisation than non-disabled people
Image .csv .xlsDisabled people whose ability to carry out day-to-day activities are “limited a lot” by their condition were less likely to have participated in a group, club or organisation (60.4%) than non-disabled people (71.9%). The proportion of disabled people whose ability to carry out day-to-day activities are “limited a little” by their condition who participated in a group, club or organisation (71.3%) was similar to that of non-disabled people (71.9%).
Disabled people in the 50 to 64 years and 65 to 74 years age groups were less likely than non-disabled people to have participated in a group, club or organisation
The proportions of disabled people who had participated in a group, club or organisation were not significantly different to non-disabled people in any age groups, apart from the 50 to 64 years and 65 to 74 years age groups. In the 50 to 64 years age group, 63.4% of disabled people had been involved in a group, club or organisation compared with 72.3% of non-disabled people. In the 65 to 74 years age group, the proportion of disabled people who had participated in a group, club or organisation (68.7%) was also less than that of non-disabled people (78.2%).
See the Disability and social participation dataset for further information on the analysis of group participation by disability and age and additional information on group participation by disability and sex.
Back to table of contents7. Glossary
Disability
To define disability in this publication, we refer to the Government Statistical Service’s (GSS’s) harmonised “core” definition. This identifies as disabled a person who has a physical or mental health condition or illness that has lasted or is expected to last 12 months or more that reduces their ability to carry-out day-to-day activities.
The GSS’s definition is designed to reflect the definitions that appear in legal terms in the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and the subsequent Equality Act 2010.
The GSS’s harmonised questions are asked of the respondent in the survey, meaning that disability status is self-reported.
Severity
Disabled people whose ability to carry-out day-to-day activities is self-reported as “limited a lot” or “limited a little” by their impairment. Respondents were asked: “Does your condition or illness reduce your ability to carry-out day-to-day activities?” with the responses, “yes, a lot” and “yes, a little” being taken to indicate severity of disability.
Statistical significance
Any changes or differences mentioned in this publication are “statistically significant”. The statistical significance of differences noted within the release are determined based on non-overlapping confidence intervals.
Civic participation
Civic participation refers to engagement in democratic processes, both in person and online, including contacting a local official (such as a local councillor or MP), signing a petition, or attending a public rally (this excludes voting).
Civic consultation
Civic consultation refers to taking part in a consultation about local services or problems in the local area through completing a questionnaire, attending a public meeting, or being involved in a face-to-face or online group.
Civic activism
Civic activism refers to involvement in activities in the local community, such as being a local councillor, school governor, volunteer special constable or magistrate (for those aged 18 years or over). Civic action also includes involvement (in person or online) in decision-making groups in the local area, for example, a group making decisions about local health or education services, a tenants’ decision-making group, or a group set up to tackle local crime problems or to regenerate the local area.
Social action
Social action refers to involvement with issues affecting the local area by doing things like setting up a new service or amenity; stopping the closure of a service or amenity; stopping something happening in the local area; running a local service on a voluntary basis; or helping to organise a community event.
Formal volunteering
Formal volunteering refers to giving unpaid help through groups, clubs or organisations.
Informal volunteering
Informal volunteering refers to giving unpaid help as an individual to people who are not a relative.
Groups, clubs and organisations
Groups, clubs and organisations refers to involvement in a group, club or organisation, excluding giving money or anything that was a requirement of a job or organised through an employer.
A list of different categories of groups are provided, and respondents select any of the groups that they have been involved in in the previous 12 months. Respondents are asked to select all that apply from the following list:
children’s education or schools
youth or children’s activities
education for adults
sport or exercise (taking part, coaching or going to watch)
religion
politics
older people
health, disability and social welfare
safety or first aid
the environment or animals
justice and human rights
local community or neighbourhood groups
citizen’s groups
hobbies, recreation, arts and social clubs
trade union activity
other
8. Measuring the data
The Community Life Survey
The Community Life Survey is a household self-completion survey of approximately 10,000 adults aged 16 years or over in England. The survey can be completed either in a paper or online format; the question regarding disability status is only asked online. Data for the 2017 to 2018 year were collected between August 2017 and March 2018.
Back to table of contents9. Strengths and limitations
Participation
This article focuses on participation in three domains of social participation: civic engagement and social action; volunteering; and groups, clubs and organisations. In each domain, participation refers to any involvement in the 12 months prior to completing the survey. In some areas (such as formal and informal volunteering), the Community Life Survey also records participation in the four weeks prior to completing the survey – this data could be used to assess more regular participation in these areas. However, in order to be consistent across our analysis, we have looked only at involvement in the previous 12 months.
Uncertainty and quality
The results in this bulletin are survey-based estimates, so they are subject to a level of uncertainty as they are based on a sample rather than the whole population. Confidence intervals are provided around every estimate and give an indication of the range in which the true population value is likely to fall. The estimates in this bulletin are supported with confidence intervals at the 95% level. This means that if we repeated the sample, we would expect the true population value to fall within the lower and upper bounds of the interval 95% of the time (that is, 19 times out of 20).
Back to table of contents